![]() ![]() Ultimately, then, the government and officers of the court have a responsibility to know how to use digital tools before filing sensitive documents in the U.S. As soon as one party disseminates that, others will un-redact and report. In the digital age, someone viewing improperly redacted court filings is going to disclose the content. Perhaps not in this case, but one nevertheless can imagine other scenarios when the dissemination of such information could pose a national security threat. Through an error in redacting, the document accidentally revealed that while he was campaign chairman, Manafort met with Konstantin Kilimnik, who is believed to. They admitted that during the 2016 campaign Manafort and his longtime associate Konstantin Kilimnik, who the FBI has said has ties to Russian intelligence, discussed a peace plan for Ukraine and that Manafort also shared with him political polling data.Īs for media ethics, It seems the standard seems situational: “If you make a digital mistake, we are absolved and so can report confidential information.” No alternative text description for this image. The media associated the disclosure with collusion, reporting that Manafort may have met with a Russian intelligence contact and provided polling data from the Trump campaign.Īttorneys for Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, inadvertently included a big reveal in a court filing on Tuesday through their clumsy failure to properly redact key portions. While the redaction blocks prevent the words from being read at first glance, anyone with Adobe Acrobat or other PDF viewing tools or even browser based viewing tools could easily copy and paste the text that still existed under the redaction blocks to another document to easily read the passages that had been redacted. Parker Heath Ed Chang Coop Redacted Zac Manafort Lucian Stroie Max Lawrence. Perhaps the disclosure would cause prosecutors or defense attorneys to change their strategy or even taint the ongoing investigation. Other ways include taking a photo of the document and making a PDF out of that or printing the document, using a felt pen to redact and scanning it back into a PDF.Īn ethical question, largely ignored by the media, is whether reporters should have disclosed the sensitive information as it was not intended for public consumption. flattens) content, also shown in the above video. However, on page 5, either his attorneys or Mueller’s staffers did not “flatten” the PDF so that the redacted passages could not be read.Īdobe has a tool that properly redacts (i.e. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team accused him. In this case, Manafort’s lawyers had filed a response to an allegation that he lied to prosecutors. Details of former Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort's alleged lies to investigators have been revealed in improperly redacted new court filings. Just select the passage and use a white background, exposing the text. Often a staff person or official uses black boxes that can be moved or removed from a document or selects and conceals passages with black background, which of course and be removed. ![]() It’s a common error. Tech experts will tell you that thousands of redacted documents online can be easily manipulated to view content. Reporters hungry for more information about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation checked to see if a mistake was made in redacting a sensitive document prepared by Manafort’s attorneys. You’d think court filings on convicted Trump-campaign associate Paul Manafort might have been properly redacted. Sager did not respond to ABC News' request for comment.In the 2016 presidential campaign, digital subterfuge was a key component, from creation of fake news to sale of Facebook user data. The exhibit containing the names of Alan Friedman, Eckart Sager, Konstantin Kliminck, and Hapsburg group members, was filed by the clerk in an unredacted form on Wednesday afternoon but was re-filed a short time later in a redacted form with those names hidden. The 21-page document also names members of the so-called “Hapsburg group” – described by Mueller in the February superseding indictment of Manafort as "a group of former senior European politicians to take positions favorable to Ukraine, including by lobbying in the United States.”Īccording to the document, some of the key participants of the Hapsburg group are former Austrian Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer, former Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi, Belgian Judge Jean-Paul Moerman, head of the German Federal Chancellory Bodo Hombach and former Spanish NATO head Javier Solana. The latest reminder came this week, when his defense lawyers failed to sufficiently redact portions of a court filing submitted on Tuesday, responding to Robert Mueller ’s claims that Manafort. A new filing from the special counsel Robert Mueller unsealed on Wednesday identifies two former journalists and the content of messages former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and a Russian associate sent them in February, just two days after a superseding indictment against Manafort. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |